MR.
LeCHER: Thank you. Do you have a witness, Mr. Flynn?
MR.
FLYNN: I do. The next witness is going to be Paulette
Cooper. I'd like to put a couple of documents quickly
on the overhead projector, if I could.
MR.
LeCHER: How many documents do you have, Mr. Flynn?
MR.
FLYNN: We'll put
MR.
LeCHER: Approximately?
MR.
FLYNN: We'll put about five or six on. Kevin, why don't
we start with Project Owl.
4-309
This
-- in interest of time, we're going to really narrow this
down. We're going to put the entire exhibit into evidence.
Some of the exhibits involve the Ops Checksheets on clay
demoing things, like Mr. Mayer was talking about: how
they do it, the documents they have to read. Some of the
documents involve how to commit a burglary, the various
steps; discussions and lessons on lock-picking devices,
how to use them, with descriptions. Some of the documents
involve things like making an evaluation of what has been
a successful and an unsuccessful action. And they 'include
things like: burglarizing, larceny, smearing, covert third-partying,
launching anti-press campaigns, tracing individual reporters,
various types of harassment,.and things like..that. It's
a -- they're multi-page documents, and I'm not sure we-have
the time to go into them. The Commission will have them
all at their disposal. For instance, one of the documents
is lists of agencies across the country that the organization
is going to burglarize to steal documents from, and it
contains the name of just about every national agency
that you could probably think of . The first exhibit on
the projector is an operation called Project Owl. And
in that operation, I would refer
4-310
you
to the second page -- well, you see under -- there's an
example up there, a major target. To handle the -- to
handle the attack being generated on Wise refund cycle,
both with Wise and his attorney and at the Suffolk County
DA's office, and then it goes through various primary
targets. And there's names: "Deac, Gary B., Kathy B.,"
a 11 of which the witness could give direct testimony
on, if we took the time.* If you go over to the second
page, you'll see a heading under "Vital Targets," and
then going down to "Operating Targets," you see: "CDC
and time tracks done on the following" - that's overt
data collections "Stanley Cath, Attorney John Lynch, John
Wise, John Wise's father, Reverend Steves," and then there's
some others penciled in there, including "Thomas Dwyer,"
who happens to be a colleague of mine from law school,
who was then in the Assistant District Attorney's Office.
Then, number two, you will see: "Obtain Cath's files on"
- then in parentheses - "(by FSM" - which is field staff
member - "or other means as appropriate)" of which there's
been testimony - "a, John Wise, b, Scientology. And Dr,-
Cath is a medical doctor from Boston or Belmont, Massachusetts
upon which Miss Cooper will testify because it was her
doctor. And then number c is:
4-311
"others
as needed" - parentheses - "(including Paulette Cooper
material not previously obtained)," which would sugge
st that they had already gone in before then. "Cliff Stanton
files, Cath personal files, material on deprogramming,
Mrs. Elaine Lieberman, Van Roeschmann, International Foundation
for Individual Freedom" - IFIT -- IFIF - "Return to Personal
Choice, Dr. Taylor and Ted Backer. Do.CDC" - that's covert
data collections - "on Cath -for data on his book, fish
for leads that Cath knows Wise and/or Stanton, use Cath
to establish lines to other areas for CDC," et cetera.
What the Commission needs to be aware of in the con- text
of all of this information is that this is just one project
of which we're getting a little more specific. And that
entire project will go in as the next exhibit. (A copy
of Project Owl was marked as Exhibit No. 48, as of this
date.)
MR.
FLYNN: Operation Freakout is a multi-page exhibit, which
the Commission can read with regard to very specific instructions
as to who was to do what in order to carry out this operation,
which -- the reading of-which is rather remarkable. The
first item of attention is under "Major Target," right
at the top, "To get PC incarcerated in a
4-312
mental
institution or jail, or at least to hit her so hard that
she drops her attack." I would.s.uggest to you that the
Project'Owl was a part of Freakout when they attempted
to obtain Miss Cooper's psychiatric files from Dr. Cath
in order to put her in a mental institution or in jail,
of which she will testify. And I would also I would also
direct the commission's attention -- we'll have to go
back to Owl and put the last page of Owl on the transparency.
And as you can see, there's all kinds there's very specific
instructions on what they do, when they do it, et cetera,
et cetera. But going down to the bottom, you'll see a
name at the bottom, "Mike Cooper." Mike Cooper is Mitchell
Hermann, who is one of the individuals who has been convicted
and is now in jail, and he was the Guardian of the Southeast
U.S. Sect, during this period of time, which was Clearwater.
And this particular project originated in your city.
MR.
CALDERBANK: Mike, these people seem to have an affinity
for infiltrating district attorneys' offices. Would you
give any information or any documentation.- I've seen
some as to the information or
4-313
infiltration
that was either gained or the office infiltrated for our
State Attorney General, Mr. Russell, or for the local
office? Was it ever targeted, or do you have documentation
to that effect, Clearwater documents?
MR.
FLYNN: Yes. There -- as I said, we've got a whole separate
package just on Clearwater, which is two or three inches
thick, which is, I would suggest to you, just; a mere
sampling of some of the documents. All of the Red i Box
data was never received. Another seventy or eighty thousand
documents are up in the Clerk's 0ffice in Washington,
D.C. under seal. -these documents are not under seal.
And the documents that have been under seal have never
been viewed by my office - and I don't know who else they've
been viewed by - but I would suggest that there may be
other documents pertaining to Clearwater.
MR.
CALDERBANK: I'd just like the people to know that our
DA offices, also, are a target - or at least in a document
- a projected target for infiltration.
MR.
FLYNN: Oh, yes. The exhibits that are in the Clearwater
packet start right at the beginning with Operation Normandy
to take over the City of Clearwater, outlining all of
the offices that are going to be infiltrated and documents
are going to be stolen from, people are going to be planted
in. There's probably thirty or
4-314
thirty-five
such offices. We'll reach that at another point in time.
But they're all laid out very clearly in Operation Normandy.
And you might remember that Normandy was a beachhead for
in Worl - d War II, and Clearwater was a beachhead for
Mr. Hubbard. Okay. We'll now go forward with Paulette
Cooper. I will have these other documents marked on how
-to commit burglaries, evaluations of which types of covert
operations are successful and unsuccessful, as well as
the drills that one goes through, such as Mr. Mayer, Mr.
Dardano, Mrs. Peterson, Mr. Walters, and others have described
as to how you're trained to do very specIrIc things. (A
copy of Operation Freakout was marked as Exhibit No. 49,
as of this date; Documents on how to commit burglaries,
evaluations of covert operations, and drills were marked
as Exhibit Nos. 50, 51, and 52, as of this date.)
MR.
LeCHER: Would you like to call your next witness, now?
MR.
FLYNN: Miss Cooper, please.
MR.
LeCHER: Miss Cooper, will you be sworn in, please?
4-315
PAULETTE
COOPER, a witness herein, having first been duly sworn
by a Clerk for the City of Clearwater, was examined and
testified as follows:
MR.
LeCHER: Miss Cooper, are you appearing here today and
testifying under oath voluntarily?
MS.
COOPER: Yes.
MR.
LeCHER: Have you been paid by anyone for your testimony,
other than the expenses for com-ing to the City of Clearwater?
MS.
COOPER: No.
Mr.
LeCHER: Do you have a lawsuit against Church of Scientoiogy?
MS.
COOPER: Yes.
MR.
LeCHER: Does the Church of Scientology have a lawsuit
against you?
MS.
COOPER: Yes.
MR.
LeCHER: How many, eighteen? -
MR.
FLYNN: And for the record, the Commissioners may remember
that one of the earlier exhibits on the purpose of a lawsuit,
which was read, to harass and discourage and to destroy
the person.
Mi.
LeCHER: Has anyone suggested to you that you should state
inything but the truth or has anyone suggested that you
change your testimony for any reason?
4-316
MS.
COOPER: No.
MR.
LeCHER: How do you defend yourself against eighteen lawsuits?
MS.
COOPER: I work day and night to support the lawyers.
MR.
LeCHER: I don't know how you could simply afford it.
MS.
COOPER: I figured out just recently that it's cost over
fifty thousand dollars for legal fees on the suits.
MR.
FLYNN: For the record, I haven't received anY of that.
MR.
LeCHER: Start at the beginning, please.
MS.
COOPER: Okay. I'm a freelance writer; I live in-Manhattan.
I'm the author of several hundred articles, two of which
are about Scientology; I'm also the author of six books,
one of which is The Scandal of Scientology. I have been
studying Scientology since 1968. The last couple of years,
the Scientologists --
MR.
LeCHER: I don't think they can hear you, Miss Cooper,'in
the back of the room.
MS.
COOPER: Okay. The last couple of years, the Scientologists
have'
4-317
been
telling the people of Clearwater that they've changed
and they've advanced a lot in the last couple of years.
I certainly haven't noticed it. As I said, the eighteenth
lawsuit was just served on me last week. I am being sued
now repeatedly by individual Scientologists, who, in some
cases, I don't even know, suits for supposedly distributing
literature at functions I didn't even attend. Part of
the purpose in harassing people with law- suits is to
keep deposing t,hem and preventina you from writing or
making a living and maiking you show up at legal depositions.
I've been deposed for nineteen days total since this started,
with four more coming up in a couple of weeks. There has
also been some other harassment in the past six montbz
or so: continued calls to me, calls to my family. The
Scientologists find out what the person's buttons are,
as they put it, and the way to get to them. And they know
that a way to get me is to harass my parents.. So, they
have been under a great deal of harassment, as well as
my harassment. They've put out libelous publications about
me; they've sent letters saying that I was soon to be
imprisoned. And you saw the Operation Freakout and
4-318
attempts
that have been made to put me in prison. They've sent
false reports about me to the Justice Department, the
District Attorney's Office, the IRS. As You know, government
agencies have to investigate any complaints that they
get. So, then, Scientology sends out press releases that
Iam under investigation by the Attorney General's Office,
I am under investigation by the DA, and so on. They have
put detectives on me; they have put spies on me. A few
months ago, they put an attempted spy on my mother to
try to get information about me from her and to fix me
up with the woman's son, so they could get direct to me.
They cancelled my plane to -- well, some- body cancelled
my plane to Florida about a month ago, and that is the
third time that happened to me this year while I was traveling.
I'd like to say that this was a very good year compared
to the previous years. And I'd like to discuss a little
bit what it was like to fight Scientology alone, starting
in 1968, because I was the only one who was speaking out.
This is a wonderful thing that there are people dpeaking
out now. But when I started, absolutely nobody else did
it. And I was the only person until from 1968 until 1973.
4-j19
In
1973, Nan McLean joined, and the two of us spoke out publically.
And then in 1976, Gabe Cazares joined, and there were
the three of us. When I Started in 1968, there was no
support from the press, there were no rallies, there were
no grand juries looking into Scientology, there were no
lawyers like Mike, Mr. Flynn. There was no peer acceptance
about what you were doing; there was just no understand-
ing that anything was wrong. It was somewhat like a social
group that people were joining and it had a veneer that
everything was going along well, a!though, based on the
testimony you've had here, you know, these dirty tricks
were going on. But if I said that they were, people thought
that I was the one that was making these things up about
them. I'd like to give a little background as to how'.1
got interested in the subject. I never was a Scientolo-
gist.' My basic interest is as a writer; I like investi-
gative things. In addition, I have a Master's Degree in
Psychology, and I studied Comparative Religion at Harvard
for a summer. A friend of mine, in 1968, joined Scientology
and he ended up in a mental institution. I'm not saying
that one caused the other, but it certainly peaked my
curiosity.
4-320
When
he escaped, he.came to visit me and he told me that he
was Jesus Christ. I then had
MR.
BERFIELD: Re was who?
MS.
COOPER: Jesus Christ. And he'd been a pretty normal person
before then. I then called our mutual friend who had gotten
him in and said, "He thinks he's Christ.." And my friend
said, "Well, he really is." So, I thought, "Well, this
bears some investigation." I went in and took their weekend
course. During the time, i wandered away Z:-rom the group
where they were teaching the particular, well, TRs, as
they call them, and I came upon a list of people, who
I don't remember for sure if it was a Fair Game Order,
but I think it was, because these people were being declared
enemies of man- kind. And it was very odd terminology.
I remember one woman's name was on there and it declared
her enemy of mankind for pushing five men down a flight
of stairs. And what -- how could she do that? It just
didn't ring like true. And I decided to contact some of
these people when I came home. And I think I took about
five names, the five top people, and every one of them
had an unlisted number, disconnected phone. Well, this
is 1968, and the
4-321
people
it was attracting were twenty-two, twenty-three years
old. And just by chance, a whole group of people are not
going to have 'Live unlisted numbers unless there's a
reason for people to unlist their number. So, it began
to bother me that, you know, was this so-called respectable
Church perhaps harassing people? And in that one weekend,
I had noted that they had lied about certain things, and
I wondered about a church lying to people. And I decided
to look in the library and see if I could get any information,
any book. I And i discovered that all the stories had
been clipped out of every single magazine pertaining to
Scientology, and I wondered whether this Church was, perhaps,
possibly stealing things. Well, I spent the next couple
of years doing research into-Scientology. And my first
article came out in December of 1969. That's also the
month that I received my first death threat. And then
a number of mysterious events occurred, both then and
during the time within the next-year and-a-half until
my book came out. I was followed on several occasions;
we found a phone tap on my phone; I was being multiply
sued already at that time. A number of -- oh, people kept
calling me and trying to take me out, and it seemed like
people were
4-322
trying
to get to me. And this went on for four unpleasant years,
includ- ing four lawsuits, one of which was for somebody
else's book. And when that happened, I got really annoyed.
And I became the first person to sue them for haras4ment,
and this was actually shocking to them because Hubbard
had written that an enemy of -- that no one would ever
sue Scientology, that they had too much to hide and that
the people were criminals whoever attacked the Church,
and, therefore, we were going to just wither away and
dieJ So, they then decided - as we know later and I'm
going to discuss this.later.- at that time that they were
c~ut to get me and they would have to silence me because,
after my book came out, I began to receive very, very
disturbing calls. And the type of things that you've been
hearing.-for the last few days were the type of things
that people would call and tell me what' -- mysteri- ous
things happening to them, that -- all kinds of very unpleasant
things. And that.everybody had a sort of paranoid feeling
and they were afraid to speak out; people were very afraid
to speak out. And yet, when enough people who don't know
each other tell you the same thing happening to them,
you begin to realize that something is going on.
4-323
Well,
about October of 1972, they started a big campaign to
finally silence me or attempt to stop me. The that month
I received the second-of what was u-1timately to be five
anonymous, absolutely, disgusting smear letters about
me. This particular one called me a part-time prostitute,
and you can imagine how upsetting it is to open up something
like that and read it. During this same period of time,
there were a large number of attempts to get into my apartment,
which was on the ground floor of the building that I lived
in at the time; it was not well guarded, and I was quite
con- I cerned. I received a tremendous number of really
dis- gusting calls, and I remember one day counting eleven
calls. Remember that I work as a freelance writer. That
means that if-1 get upsetting calls and I'm unhappy, it's
very hard to just pick up and to write what you were working
on. A lot of abusive calls then and over the years, just
the sort of -- you pick up the phone and somebody says,
"Oh, what are you doing?" And they'd hang up and call
back, so you have to take the phone off the hook. And
if you're trying to reach somebody, they can't call you
back. Well, I finally decided that I was going to move
to
4-324
a
higher-security apartment, even though I really could
not afford to do so at the time. I moved on December 15th.
on December -- the person who took over the apartment
was my second cousin. We bore a physical resemblance,
but -- basically, because we're about the same age and
she was very petite and we both had short, brown hair
at the time.
And
a series of mysterious circumstances occurred. The important
thing was that she opened up the door to someon e who
had flowers and rang my bell. And I was no longer living
there, although, my name was still on the door. And so,
Eddie Walters told you about R2-45, and you've heard the
policy. When Joy opened the door to get these flowers,
he unwrapped the gun -- he unwrapped the flowers and there
was a gun in it. And he took the gun and he put it at
Joy's temple and he cocked the gun, and we don't know
whether it misfired, whether it was empty.and it was a
scare technique, what happened, but, somehow, the gun
did not go off. And the -- he started choking her, and
she was able to break away and she started to scream.
And the person ran away.
And
so, she called a detective and he said, "It's a very wild
attack because there doesn't seem to be any motive for
it." There was no attempted rape, there was
4-325
no
attempted robbery, and why should somebody just suddenly
try to kill her.
The
-- about a week or two later at my new apart- ment, I
received a visit from the FBI. And they informed that
the public relations person for Scientology had claimed
that she had received a couple of bomb threats and asked
-- and had named me as somebody likely to send 1~ bomb
threats. So, the -- I didn't take the whole thing very
seriously, and the FBI asked me if I would mind being
fingerprinted. And I said that I would not, and I i was
f increrorinted. At the same time my cousin Joy's boyfriend
had beeni very, very upset about what happened. And he
said, "Boy, you better let your Scientology spies know
that you have moved and where you are because I don't
want anything to happen to her-again." And I did. And
shortly thereafter, in my -- to my new building, half
the tenants, which is approximately three hundred tenants
in the building, received a very, very disgusting anonymous
smear letter about me, trying to get me kicked out of
the apartment, and saying that I had venereal disease,
that I would sexually molest little children. The only
thing that was true in the letter was my age, which was
not something I wanted known anyway. And it
4-326
was
very, very embarrassing. As I was walking through the
building -- and I've heard people talking about me in
'the elevator, and I was just sort of slinking along and
I was really -a month later my parents received an anonymous
smear letter about me, accusing me of prac- ticing sexual
perversions with their clergyman. These were not very
good months. So -- and I was called ffor grand jury around
this time. At least, I didn't think this was anything
very serious and did not bother to retain a lawyer, had
verv little money because I had used all my money to !move
to this more expensive, higher-security apartment. And
when I got there, they told me that I was the target of
an investigation into the bomb threats. And I went and
had to hire a lawyer, and every lawyer wanted -- the least
we could get was five thousand-dollar retainer, which,
in those years, was like paying ten thousand dollars,
you know, today. And to suddenly have to pay this sum
of money and find out that you're in serious trouble,
and no one would -- the governrent would not tell my lawyers
what the evidence was against me. They wouldn't show me
the letters. Anyway, finally, I went before the grand
jury, and I tried to answer every question as truthfully
as I could.
4-327
I
never took the Fifth Amendment. And they kept asking me
again and again, "Did you ever see this letter? Did you
ever touch it? Do you know who might have?" And I said,
incidentally, "Yes," that I suspected they might have
sent it to themselves because we had some unpleasant confrontations
in the press. And then they asked me to step outside the
room. And when I came in, I knew I was in very serious
trouble, and they asked me what my social security number
was, whether I was on druqs, and did I realize what I
had saidl I so far. And again, they asked me the same
series of questions. And then they said, "Well, Miss Cooper,
if you've never touched this letter before, could you
tell us how your fingerprints got on it?" And I felt like
a grand piano had jus-t.hit me on the head. I -- I fainted
sittin up; the whole room just turned upside down and
I didn't know what to do. And then, of course, the lawyers
wanted more money. And on May -- let's see, May 19th,
1973, 1 was indicted on the three counts of sending bomb
threats through the mail; two counts were for two letters.
One was for perjury for saying before the grand jury that
I hadn't done it and that I thought this publ-ic relations
4-328
person
might have done it. On May 29th, ten days later, I was
arrested and I was arraigned. The next eight months were
a terrible, terrible nightmare in my life that I still
feel sometimes that I suffer from to this day. I had fifteen
years in jail over my head and fifteen thousand dollars
in fines. I was petrified about going to jail, more so,
perhaps, because of my small frame and the fact that I
heard that women's federal prisons were rough places.
I risked having my career totally destroyed because --
and I had been success-fful. And as an a free- lance writer,
what editor is ever going to give an assign-' ment to
someone who's been indicted or convicted for sending bomb
threats to someone they opposed? I was very concerned
about the indictment and the trial coming out in the newspapers.
The public does not know the difference between indict
and convict, and they think that if you're on trial for
something, you must have done it or where there's smoke,
there's fire. I was left with the terrible public humiliation
that every person I ever knew in New York would read-the
details of the triAl and these accusations. I was most
concerned about my parents, who had adopted me when I
was six years old, and how humiliating
4-329
it
would be for them and their friends to have to explain
and to go through a trial like this. During this period
of time, I went through a terrible, terrible depression
and a number of my friend.s, which I can't blame them
for, did not stick by me. I was depressing to be with.
I had been seeing a man.for five years and had intended
to marry him, and he left as a result of my depression.
I was released on my own recognizance, but I was not allowed
to leave the state. And this made it difficult because
I had friends in Connecticut and in New jersey, and it
was just ali 1 could do to get away for a weekend. But
it was so humili- ating to have to go to the court and
ask permission to go twenty miles away that I couldn't
do it. I went through a period of very, very acute anxiety.
I would go to-sleep -- I couldn't fall asleep till about
four in the morning and I'd wake up about six with my
stomach just in my throat and worrying about what the
next day would bring and what was going to happen at the
initial hearing. And this went on for eight months, and
I was just totally exhausted, sleeping two to four hours
a day. I couldn't drag myself around anymore. All the
money I had had gone to lawyers, and I went into debt
to try to continue to pay for them. The -- in
4-330
the
end, just the main lawyers cost nineteen thousand dollars.
I was totally unable to write during this period. I was
-- the depression was very, very bad and I couldn't concentrate.
I attempted to write, but it was really very bad writing.
And I stopped eating because I was filled with such nausea
and exhaustion. I tried to force myself to have -- I took
a sixteen ounce-glass of tomato juice each day and two
eggs. About half the time, I would just eat it and then
go to bathroom and throw it up; I just couidn't hold food
in my stomach.. Oh, a year earlier I had been operated
on and a lot of the.-- I was physically ill as well during
this period. Mentally, I just totally fell apart about
half way through. I developed, for the first time in my
life, acute agoraphobia; I couldn't leave the house. I
think that this really started with this attempted murder
that I felt had been intended for me. But then, you have
to remember, I didn't want to walk around my building
because I was hearing people talking about the lady with
VD. A~fid I had been very concerned when they were going
to arrest me that they were going to arrest me~in the
lobby of my building and humiliate me among my neighbors
4-331
further.
So, this was the genesis of a sudden inability to go out.
And some of my friends were very, very good. They would
come over and try to force me to get out and get my mind
off what was going on. It worked for a while. Around September/October,
it didn't work anymore. One friend came over, alaxmed
that I had not left the house for a week, andhe said,
"You've got to walk around the bl~ock." And I remember
we stepped outside about two or three steps and I just
started crying and I said, "Don't 7,a"-,-- me. T can't
do it; I just can't do i-." And then I went home and I
stayed inside for about two more weeks. And meanwhile,
during this period of time, there was a friend, a new
friend, who I met under somewhat mysterious circumstances,
but he was very, very helpful. And I obtained an apartment
for him in my building, and he did some of the food shopping
that I could not get out and do. And his name was Jerry
Levin. And everybody -- the worst period of time was approkimately
two weeks before the trial.. My lawyers informed me that,
with a federal case, it was a ninety- five percent chance
of conviction. They then gave me the good news that, for
the trial, they wanted my parents to be seated in the
front row and watch the entire
4-332
proceedings.
And I kept saying, "You can't do that to them. It's going
to be awful enough for them to read it in the paper."
And they said, "You don't understand, if you're parents
don't show up, the jury doesn't realize," you know, "that
this is what you want. They're just going to" -- they
felt that the one circumstance that might get me acquitted
was the mutually close relationship with my parents. On
top of that, go ing through.some Scientology material
that I had obtained, there was the name of Jerry Levin.
Now, I horribly betraved, but at the same time I simply
did not want to believe it. I was very naive, and his
name was a very common name, especially, in a city like
New York. meanwhile, we had tried every single move possible
to get the trial stopped. And but I was in a very, very
nervous state and it was impossible for me to be tested
correctly. And we went to some doctors who said that they
felt the only thing that might work would be if I would
go into a state where I didn't know what was going on,
meaning sodium pentothal or truth serum, because,to do
that, you have to be -- you're unconscious; it's like
an operation. So, the problem was we couldn't find a doctor
who
4-333
would
give me a sodium pentothal t.est because, by this time,
I weighed eighty-three pounds; I had started about ninety-eight.
And it became very, very dangerous to go and put somebody
under, as if for an operation, and do that. And I just
said I didn't care if the operation -- not the operation,
but if the sodium pentothal killed me because, if I had
to stand trial for what I didn't do and humiliate everyone
a nd go through this humiliation, that I would just as
soon be dead anyway. And we finally did find a doctor
two weeks before trial who gave me a sodium pentothal
test. I was uncon- scious for seven hours. I don't know
what I said during that. I do know that, when I came to,
my mother was standing there and I said, "What happened?
What did I say?" And she just said,."It's okay. It's all
over. There won't be a trial." The government wanted to
save face because they don't'like to admit that they've
made a mistake. So, they said that they wouldn't actually
they would postpone the trial, but they would not actually
drop the charges at that'time. They also'ordered me to
see a psychiatrist which I thought was very humiliating.
The government did not drop the charges and, for two years
after all this. 11 1 still had to worry on a daily
4-334
basis
whether one day there was going to Joe a trial and all
of these things that I was afraid of, the prison and so
on, was going to happen. The next year was 1974, and there
were a number of new lawsuits against me. Oh, continued
harassments, including harassments of my family and their
clergyman, new spies.. By the summer, which was about
seven months after the worst period of this whole thing,
! remember that one of my friends said that htat was the
first time he had seen me smile in a year and-a-half.
And so, I decided, in fact, that I was goina to try to
get back this gentleman that I was interested in. And
I threw a birthday party to have an excuse to invite him
to something and I sent an invitation, and he then wrote
me the most incredible letter back. And what I found out
was that there was then a fifty anonymous smear letter
about me, this one sent to him and his bosses, and he
would never talk to me again; and he never has. In 1975J,
the charges against me were finally dropped. But during
this period, they started a new type of harassment. And
then I began receiving things in the mail, silch as copies
of -- I had kept a diary from when I was seventeen to
about twenty, and there was my diary suddenly coming back
to me, copies of letters that I had 4:- 3 35 sent out
- or my carbon copy of it - and a psychiatrist's report
that Mr. Dardano explained that he stole. In 1976, the
charges were -- no, excuse me. In late 175, the charges
were finally dropped. At that point some very bizarre
things happened that, it wasn't until later, I would learn
were part of another attempt to put me in jail. But --
for example, people were somebody was calling a number
of my close friends, imi- tating my voice to a degree
that was good enough that some people stopped talking
to me, others called and yelled at me: why should I'have
called and been so rude and so on. And I said, "I didn't
call." And then I went to a writers' meeting and someone
said, "Gee, how was Washington?" I said, "I haven't been
to Washington in two years." They said, "You called from
Washington." I didn't unde-rstand at the time why these
things were being done. Also, at a I was with a group
of writers and someone showed me a joke, and I realized
afterwards that it appeared to be an attempt to get my
fingerprints aaain. And I became very, very upset because,
after all, I had a, quote, record, end quote. And I was
very concerned about the possibility of more"bomb threats.
In there were many, many more things that were
4-336
done
to me over the years, but this is -- I'm trying to summarize
a little bit. In December of 1976, 1 became very, very
tired of it all. By that time there were nine lawsuits
against me. Right before I went to court, all the stuff
was remailed to me that was mailed in the past, sort of
a subtle blackmail: "This is what's going to happen if
you don't settle." Scientology wanted me to settle quite
badly. Also, they convinced me at that time that they
changed and that they really were a very nice orgAniza-
tion, and that,by my continued statements and stance against
them and my book, I was preventing them from doing the
good deeds that they wanted to do or that they were doing
by bringing up the bad things all the time. And in December
of '76, 1 agreed, in a sense, that -- it's easier to just
say that I agreed, in a sense, not to bad mouth.them and
they agreed not to bad mouth me. While they were telling
me that they had changed, unbeknownst to me, there was
a man named Michael Meisner and he had been a top GO operative
- and they were hold- ing him'under gag and handcuff.
And this man knew that I had been criminally framed and
he knew about a lot of things that had been going on.
4-337
In
the summer of 1977, the FBI raided the three Scientology
organizations. On October 12th, 1977, the FBI called me.
Now, remember, this was' a five-year period that.I had
never been able to prove my innocence; the government
considered me a criminal; I had a, quote, record, end
quote. And the FBI called out of the blue and said, '.'We
have just received evidence that you were innocent of
this those orig.inal charges." And I hung up the phone
and cried and I, in fact, tried to reach that person thatwas
no longer talking to me, but he had since remarried. I
worked with the FBI for the next couple of years. I did
learn before -- in the investigation that was going on
that the murder attempt on Joy was seemingly intended
for me by Scientology. I learned that they had broken
-- Scientology -had broken into my New.York lawyer's office
and this was one of many lawyers to break into, but that
was the first one. And I learned, which was, to me, the
most important thing, that they had framed me-in 1972.
And -- letme skip ahead a little bit to some of the stuff
that -- there were more lawsuits. Anyway, at the end of
1979, 1 f inally saw the documents that had been seized.
There were twenty-three
4-338
thousand
documents. And there were documents I'm sorry, twenty-three
thousand that were available to the public. And there
were two documents that finally made it very clear that
I had been criminally framed, and it was very important
to me that, at last, I was publically able to proclaim
my innocence and not worry about the -- what anybody would
sa , and that I.no longer -- I always y y felt that I
had to hide the fact that I had been arrested. And if
I would meet someone and if they had any political ambitions,
I wouldn't tell him why, but I would quickly stop seeing
him for his sake. So, it was something that I was hiding,
and it was affecting my life in various ways. ,We found
one document that, apparently, indicated that they were
considering the use of the Mafia on me, but that they
decided instead to criminally frame me, so that Scientology
would not look bad. we found a document that we found
a number of documents that proved that this fellow who
had been helping me, I thought, during the period that
I was, oh, having such a bad time -- he was calling a
diary into Scientology as to what I was doing, how close
I was to suicide, and, you know, cheering me on, like,
you know: "She can't sleep again, that she's talking suicide..
Wouldn't this be great for Scientology?"
4-339
It's
very strange from reading the diary of somebody that you
think is a friend and is wishing you dead and working
in your behalf towards that direction. Incidentally, this
particular fellow, who's name was Jerry Levin -- they
changed his name to Don Alberto, and he became one of
the biggest dirty tricks operatives down in Clearwater.
He also was the person that was sent to Washington and
planted the bug in the IRS. We saw a document called Operation
Freakout, which
Mr.
Flynn started to show you before. Remember, 1 men- tioned
these very bizarre phone calls, people posing as me? We
think that they were trying to test my voice because,
part of Operation Freakout -- Operation Freakout consisted
of six different ways to try to get me jailed again, since
the charges had been dropped. one of the ways was to p-all
in bomb threats in a voice that would sound like mine;
another was to write bomb threats very similar to the
original ones but pasted on Writers' Digest stationery,
so that they would come to the conclusion that -- so that
the FBI would come to the conclusion that this must have
been done by a writer. Operation Freakout consisted of
plans to have some- body pose as me -- find out what I
was-wearing, have some- one dress like me, look like me,
and they would crack up
4-340
publically
and they would try to get me arrested for that person
threatening to bomb various places. The other document
that I saw was that a number of these lawsuits against
me were being maliciously created. For example, they were
bringing my book, The Scandal of Scientology, into countries
where it had not even been published and they were saying'--
you know, so -- "brought the book in so we can sue." The
reason for those terrible calls that I had men- tioned
was that they had out my name up on walls through-~ out
Manhattan and -- with my phone number, so t.hat people!
would give me these calls. Operation Owl was in there.
I don't know if I mentioned that Operation Freakout originated
in Clear- water, even though the basis of the attack was
against a New York resident, namely, me.
Mr.
Flynn showed you Operation Owl, which also originated
in Clearwater. Oh, a copy of my diary the one that had
been mailed to me - was found in a file marked "National
Council of Churches." They had hidden a lot of their --
the stu!Ef that they shouldn't have had. And there were
also things that I didn't even know that they had gotten.
For example, my mother once complained to me that she
4-341
couldn't
figure out why for the last few years my father kept being
audited again and again, and nothing ever turned up; he's
an excrutiatingly honest person. And there was an order
to give an anonymous tip to the IRS that my father was
evading taxes, and I don't know if that was the cause
of it. But I'm saying that it was this type of thing.
I also learned from the documents that they were suing
me for things that were true. For example, they repeated-ly
sued me for saving that Charles Manson was a Scientologist,
and there were fifty to a hundred docu- ments showing
how they were trying to hide the fact that Charles Manson-had
studied.Scientology. There were surveillance reports.
I think I had mentioned that I'd been followed at various
times and was pretty sure of it. It's kind of spooky sitting
there and reading, you know, "She turned up Aken Street,
walked for five minutes there, stopped in the candy store."
And there were reports that my friends were being harassed.
There was a notation to cause trouble with this gentleman
that I mentioned. There were spies' reports and taped
transcripts of'telephone conversations that I had had
with people.
4-342
The
-- I think I spoke to 60 Minutes when I was down here
in Clearwater last, and I said then that I had been saying
that these types of things had been going on and people
kept saying,-"Well, what is she talking about? This is
a church." And it was incredible vindication to look at
these documents and see that everything I had said about
Scientology since 1968 was true, and that they had turned
out to be worse than anything I had said or even imagined.
. Now, Scientology, at that time, had said that they had
changed. And I know because Gabe -- ',Iayor Cazares mailed
me the same things from-the Clearwater Sun, and I read
what they told you. While they were saying that, they
had learned where I was in Washington, D.C., at the Washington
Hilton, and planted a bug by my bed there and, also, a
bug on the telephone, during this period of time while
they were making these statements in Clearwater about
how they had changed. And I do not believe that they have
changed, and that -- this is one of the reasonsi or the
main reason, why I wanted to come here and warn you, because
I have .been studying this for many years. And I have
heard them say that they have changed and, gee, they don't
they
4-343
may
be issuing that kind of statement after this is over;
"Well, you know, there were some things that were said,
but, you know, we don't do that anymore" kind of thing.
And I've heard before - even before I started researching
Scientology - they were saying this. For example, in 1965,
there was something called the Austral- ian Inquiry, a
Commission to look into Scientology. Any- way, after studying
Scientology, the Commission came to the conclusion that
Scientology quote: "Scientology 4S evil, its techniques
evil. practice is a serious zhreat medically, morally,
and socialiy. its adherence often establishes it with
the mentally-ill." And at that time Scientology issued
a statement that, of course, they had changed. in 1968,
1 believe, with the Foster Report, when the English held
an inquiry to look into Scientology, and Scientology issued
a statement that Fair Game had been cancelled, that the
Disconnect Policy had been cancelled, and that everything
had changed. In 1975, they had World Prayer Day, and the
press all believed at that time that they had changed.
In December of 1976, when I settled with them, I believed
they had changed. In 1977, when the FBI raided them, they
said that they had changed. In '79, when statements came
4-344
out
about what was in the documents, and in 1980, again, they
were telling people that they had changed. And my final
point is that I believe that they haven't changed.. I
believe that their basic policy, ever since the policy
was first written, has been the Fair Game Policy. The
policy is to trick people; the policy is to sue people;
the policy is to lie to people and to destroy them. And
Icertainly know from a per- sonal standpoint. A nd I've
only briefly told you some of t4h,e things that they've
done to me, so t1hat you're not dece-J,.-ed by their true
nature. I'~,-e been study4ng'them for fourteen years and,
unfortunately, I've been a victim of this cult for fourteen
years. And I believe tha t Scientology has never changed,
will never change, and will keep issuing statements to
people saying that they've changed.
MR.
LeCHER: Thank you for your
MR.
FLYNN: If I could just make one point of information for
the Commission that I believe is sig- nificant: The most
relevant portion of Miss Cooper's testimony is the fact
that for years she suffered from. harassm1ent and framing,
which was -- has been proved by some of the documents
already in evidence, to which she's testified, and the
documents that we put in-evidence
4-345
before
this Commission. The final area for this Commission to
examine is that of deception on all of the items that
I mentioned earlier: deception of confidential auditing
information,
Mr.
Hubbard's background, the goals, policies, purposes, and
practices of the organization to the thousands of people
that are coming here to Clearwater and paying millions
of dollars. Miss CooDer's evidence viv-4dl7 describes
the policy of the Church to util'Lze the "Fair Game Policy,
of which mo s C h ur c1- 7, -rib e r s w',-, o a r e--
~p a n g ions o-- dol. i lars do not know. And that policy
has been described, ~.rom 1968, in her testimony right
up to the present time. And the Commission will be able
to derive whatever inferences are appropriate from her
testimony with regard to the practice and deception regarding
the goals and purposes and operations of the Church of
Scientology in this city.
MR.
LeCHER: I'd like to say: Thank you for your story and
thank you for the evidence that relates specifically to
Clearwater. I have at various times talked to members
of the Church of Scientology who have told me that they've
changed, too, as recently as Hebert Jentz a few months
4-346
ago,
who said. that they had changed. And I thank you for telling
us your story. I don't -- every story today seems to get
more incredible as the-people come on. And I don't know
how you could survive what you have survived, and I think
that you must be one hell of a woman. I -- I really have
no questions. I don't know 1,cw you even -- you can trust
anybody anymore: a man that you might meet that he is
one of them and trying to get you again. That must prey
on your mind. And what with even with just day-to-day
contact with business associ- ates and females and family
members. So, I don't want to put you through any more
of your story. You've relived it, an aberration for these
many years.__ And I will then refer to my colleagues,
and I hope-that they will also be sensitive to that fact
and also be brief. Who do I start with?
MR.
BERFIELD: I have -- I have just one question, and it's
not so related to what happened to you there. But you
said you've spent fifteen years in studying Scientology?
4-347
MS.
COOPER: Well, I started researching in 1968; it's fourteen
years.
MR.
BERFIELD: In this study.--
MS.
COOPER: Yeah.
MR.
BERFIELD: without any reference to religion
MS.
COOPER: Mm-mm.
MR.
BERFIELD: -- and going back, have you found out where
they picked vp these deceptive ideas from or whose --
were they L. Ron Hubbard's or did he get them Z ~_rom
somebody else or what?
MS.
COOPER: Well, when I researched the book, I went through
a tremendous number of early policy 'Letters by Hubbard,
things that he wrote about in the early 19501s, even when
it was Dianetics. And the fraud was just started way back;
Hubbard excelled in it. He was con- stantly lying to his
people. You find that, you know, that one thing just totally
negated another. And I think the deception and the lies
all stem from Mr. Hubbard.
MR.
BERFIELD: Thank you.
MR.
LeCHER: Okay. Does anyone have any questions? Thank you
very much.