MS. VAUGHAN: —— standard procedure.
  MR. CROW: I’m not going to debate. I’ve

been litigating many years, I’m sure you’ve got a lot
of experience, and the fact is we don’t see eye to eye.
We think when we subpoena documents it should be ——
whether the search should involve more than what he did
I’m not really going to debate. I think the record
will speak for itself. And somebody else, if it ever
becomes public, can look at it and decide that. But 
and that’s not really something that I think either you
or I are going to discuss out and resolve our
difference.

discussions. And what troubles me, when we got 
involved in this case, I think that the police were at
a point in their investigation nowhere near where they
are today. And a lot of witnesses have come in and
talked to them. There were Fed Exes of records.
You’ve got ——
MR. CROW: What’s point your? 
MS. VAUGHAN: The point is, I sense

animosity, I did, that we’re stonewalling or doing
something to hinder the investigation. And it’s just