250

search, somebody intentionally withheld them, whether I

can hold that person in contempt or not. So I’m a
little —- I’m a little unclear with the ambiguity in
the response. And that’s something that we may need to
work on when I get back from vacation. But ——
MS. VAUGHAN: Well, what we can say is that

they don’t exist, and they haven’t been analyzed for
purposes of work product.

MS. VAUGHAN: And we conducted an extensive

search. That was Glen’s purpose. Glen was not to be a

fact witness, go from A person to B person to R person,

it wouldn’t be helpful. 

I’m not going to debate --

MS. VAUGHAN: He is from the
Church of Scientology. There are a number of witnesses
in the case, and when we got in the case we would
request that Mr. Steilo not speak to other witnesses in
the case. And I think that’s standard. Plus these
people are represented by counsel. I don’t think that
that is —— I mean, I understand that you’re upset about
that, but I don’t think that that’s standard --