
Who
Can Stand Up?
Editorial
by Frank Rich
March
16, 1997
"Can
anyone stand up to the Church of Scientology? "
Such
was the plaintive question asked by The St. Petersburg Times
in an editorial last week, and
with good reason. The great American religious saga of the 1990's may
be the rise to power of a church that has successfully brought the Internal
Revenue Service, the State Department and much of the American press
to heel even as it did an end-run around the courts.
As
Douglas Frantz reported in The New York Times a week ago, Scientology
in 1993 suddenly metamorphosed from a controversial and highly lucrative
organization, with an extensive history of criminal activity in the
1970's, into a bonafide nonprofit religion -- at least as far as the
U.S. Government was concerned. That's when the I.R.S. turned its back
on 25 years of its own rulings and gave Scientology the tax-exempt legitimacy
it had long craved. What made this decision startling was not only the
I.R.S. 's contradiction of both itself and various court decisions on
Scientology's tax status, but also the mysterious circumstances that
brought on the about-face. Scientology's victory was set in motion in
1991 when two of its leaders dropped by the I.R.S. 's Washington headquarters
unannounced and somehow secured an audience with the agency's then Commissioner,
Fred Goldberg Jr.
Why
did Mr. Goldberg afford some of the I.R.S. 's most ferocious longtime
antagonists the red-carpet treatment John Q. Taxpayer would never receive?
He isn't saying, and the fateful meeting was not even recorded in his
appointment calendar. Nor do we know what is in the agreement that the
I.R.S. and Scientology subsequently negotiated -- since the I.R.S. also
acceded to the church's demand for secrecy. What we do know, thanks
to Mr. Frantz, is that the settlement followed years of costly Scientology
litigation against the I.R.S. and an extensive investigation of I.R.S.
employees by Scientology -hired gumshoes.
Scientology
will stop at little to try to silence its foes. Time magazine had to
spend $7 million to successfully defend itself against libel -- a decision
now under appeal -- after its 1991 expose of Scientology as a "hugely
profitable global racket." The Cult Awareness Network, a Chicago-based
organization that battled cults, was driven to financial ruin by litigation
brought by Scientologists and their associates; now it's in the hands
of a Scientologist and proselytizes for the church. The Tampa Tribune,
The St. Petersburg Times and the Clearwater, Fla., police department
are currently under vicious attack by the Scientology magazine, Freedom;
that's the price they must pay for pursuing the mysterious 1995 death
of a 36-year-old Scientologist who had been planning to leave the church.
Those
who police Scientology as if it still might be a racket -- most harshly
Germany, which regards the church as a "pseudo-science" sowing
psychological and financial ruin -- are invariably labeled Nazis by
its leaders. Because of the I.R.S. decision, Scientology complaints
about foreign governments are now treated officially as human-rights
grievances by the State Department. Madeleine Albright, who has already
raised the issue with Germany, may eventually have to take other allies
to task as well. The Washington Post reported on Jan. 27 that a Greek
judge closed a Scientology church center in Athens for "medical,
social and ethical practices that are dangerous and harmful" and
that an Italian court ordered jail terms for 29 Scientologists found
guilty of "criminal association."
Perhaps
these governments are Nazis, too, and the I.R.S. , whose senior officials
defended the legal merits of the agency's decision in conversations
last week, is right: maybe Scientology, which charges its followers
tens of thousands of dollars for the mandatory counseling sessions it
calls "auditing," is indeed a benign nonprofit organization
entitled under tax law to be underwritten by American taxpayers. But
given the cost of this decision, shouldn't all the circumstances surrounding
it be revealed? And where are the network TV interviews with David Miscavige,
the Scientology leader whose casual visit to the I.R.S. in 1991 brought
such blessings? No one can say he isn't newsworthy. As the head of an
empire that purports to have eight million followers, he is the spiritual
ruler of the most successful new religion to be founded in this century.
Copyright
1997 The New York Times Company
|