Scientology Leaders Convicted of Fraud March 17, 1978 PARIS - The
Paris Tribunal has found four leaders of the Church of Scientology, including
the American Founder, guilty of making fraudulent claims that physical
cures and professional success can be achieved through Scientology. The hour-long verdict, read Feb. 14, was the result of a seven-year public inquiry and a lengthy trial last November. Ron Lafayette Hubbard, the American founder of the sect, was condemned to four years imprisonment and a fine of 35,000 francs (a little over $7000). Harry Laarhuis, Dutch former executive director of the French branch of the organization, was condemned to three years and a fine of 15,000 francs. Mrs. Jacquelline Valentin, French former head of the church in France, was sentenced to two years in prison and a fine of 10,000 francs. Georges Andreu, husband
of the actual head of the French Church of Scientology, was given a suspended
one-year prison sentence and a fine of 3,000 francs. Andreu was the only
accused to appear in person during the trial. The other three, who are
"somewhere abroad," were condemned in absentia (a practice permitted
by French law), and the judge published a warrant for their arrest. Andreu stated afterwards
that he will appeal the decision, which he denounced as "a violation
of the letter and the spirit of both French law and the European convention
of human rights." During his speech, the presiding judge of the tribunal
stressed the fact that "the present lawsuit only concerns the commercial
activities of the French Association of Scientology, and that the court
was not interested in judging whether Scientology is a religion or not." After giving a definition
of fraud - recourse to fraudulent activities to raise false hopes in order
to procure sums of money - the judge concluded that the facts and statements
by the witnesses were "ample proof" of the veracity of the charge. The French organization,
he said, made false promises regarding professional success and the cure
of psychosomatic illnesses, with the sole aim of "increasing the
financial revenue," to use Hubbard's own words. The case for the
defense had been entirely based on the religious nature claimed by the
movement, but the court refused to examine this aspect of the question. The court examined
evidence of large profits made by an organization which declares itself
to be non-profit, the psycho-therapeutic nature of a treatment dispensed
by people with no medical qualifications, and claim made by Scientology
to be "capable of curing some 70 percent of human illnesses, including
those formerly considered to be without help - radioactive burns, the
atomic bomb, etc." In a statement sent to the French Ministry of Justice, D. Gaiman of the executive council of the Church of Scientology of Great Britain, accused the French court of having perpetrated a travesty of justice. He demanded that the judges of the Tribunal be "reprimanded and threatened to take the matter to an international court. |