Daniel A. Leipold,
State Bar No. 77159 Attorney for Plaintiff,
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, Jesse
Prince declare as follows: MY PARTICIPATION IN SCIENTOLOGY 2. I am intimately
familiar with the Scientology organization, movement and beliefs because
I was in Scientology for 16 years (1976-92) and served in the highest
ranks, including as the second in command of the Religious Technology
Center (RTC). At that time, my position was "Deputy Inspector General,
External" which meant being in charge of all activities outside the
body of Scientology. This included being in charge of all litigation by
or against any Scientology organization, intelligence (spying, covert
operations) brought against perceived or imagined "enemies"
(which ranged from critics to media to the courts), trademark registrations,
and the licensing of trademarks to other Scientology organizations, which
was how we tightly controlled all Scientology corporations while creating
the false impression of "corporate integrity." 3. From the time
RTC was created in the early 80's until the time I left RTC, RTC was the
most senior, most powerful and most influential organization in all of
Scientology. All RTC employees were Sea Org members. 5 . During my tenure
with RTC, I have been privy to the destruction and alteration of documents
to protect the group. For example, on or about April of 1983 I was present
at a meeting, which took place in Los Angeles, California at a Scientology
office called Author Services, Inc. (ASI). ASI presented itself as the
"literary agency" for Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. In
reality it was actually where the Scientology empire was being run from
at that time. All of Scientology was being directed from ASI in 1983.
ASI was where various Scientology corporations went to receive orders.
7 . One principle reason why tax exempt status had not been granted was the IRS's position that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard (LRH) was actually the managing agent of Scientology in complete disregard of the corporate structure of Scientology. We knew this to be a fact but also knew that it violated IRS rules and thus had to be hidden. 8 . There was concern
that the IRS would obtain the hundreds of daily, weekly and monthly LRH
orders written by Mr. Hubbard and distributed throughout Scientology.
These orders were commonly referred to in Scientology as "advices"
to avoid the appearance that LRH was actually running Scientology. In
fact, LRH was running Scientology. The principle concern expressed at
this meeting was that the LRH orders or "advices" would be used
to name L. Ron Hubbard as the managing agent of Scientology. 9 . Because of an already existing fear that an LRH "advice" might fall into the wrong hands, these orders from him were written in a way that we could deny it was from him. His name was not on them. He was never cited in the dispatch except in the third person. There was no signature and a salutation in reply was never more than "Dear Sir." The routing at the top referred to him merely as "*," an asterisk. However if a person (or an agency) got enough of these, there would be little doubt that we were in touch with Hubbard (via ASI) and he was telling us and each corporation what to do to make him more money. 10. David Miscavige
specifically stated that ASI was "already dealing with the problem",
ridding ASI of any documents that would implicate L. Ron Hubbard as managing
agent of Scientology. He stated that under his directive the LRH orders,
or "advices", were being collected and transferred by truck
to a Riverside County recycling plant where the documents were to be "pulped".
This method of destruction was considered to be better than shredding.
I was also given instructions that I was in charge of purging the remainder
of the Scientology organization of LRH orders. This was to include Church
of Scientology of California (CSC); Church of Scientology International
(CSI); and, RTC. 11. Several weeks
after this first meeting, I attended second meeting at the ASI offices
concerning the continuing destruction of Scientology corporate documentation.
In attendance at the second meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock,
Vicki Aznaran, Norman Starkey of ASI and Marty Rathburn of ASI. At this
meeting, David Miscavige for the first time, stated that Scientology had
been ordered by a court to produce various documents concerning a former
Scientology member named Lawrence Wollersheim who had a lawsuit pending
in Los Angeles against the Church of Scientology of California. The court
had ordered Scientology to produce Mr. Wollersheim's entire 'preclear"
(PC) file. 13. Mr. Wollersheim's
PC file was several thousand pages in length and stood as high as a six-foot
tall man. Initially at this meeting, it was decided that Mr. Wollersheim's
PC file would be redacted and culled of any evidence or documentation
which might assist Mr. Wollersheim in his lawsuit against CSC. There was
also concern that the materials known as Clear, OT I, OT II, OT III and
NED for OTS (NOTS) would be open to public inspection if Mr.Wollersheim's
files were produced as ordered. Scientologists are taught that a person
could catch pneumonia and die if that person is prematurely exposed to
these 'upper level" materials without first having taken many hours
of preparatory auditing. COMMON SCIENTOLOGY PRACTICE OF DECEPTION AND LIES IN THE WOLLERSHEIM CASE AND IN GENERAL 18. During the time
I was on the Board of Directors of RTC, (1983 to 1987) I attended numerous
legal strategy sessions that dealt with the Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology
case. Most of these legal strategy sessions took place in the boardroom
at Author's Services, Inc. The general legal strategy of Scientology both
before and after the Wollersheim judgment was rendered against the Church
of Scientology of California was to make the case so complex and expensive
that it would go on forever and Mr. Wollersheim would never be able to
collect "One Thin Dime".
20. During the same
period of time, I was also present at legal strategy sessions that dealt
with the Christofferson case in Oregon and the David Mayo case in the
USDC for the Central District of California also known as RTC, et al.
v. Robin Scott 85-711-JMI (Bx). The identical legal strategy was employed
in those actions.
CORPORATE NAMES AND BOUNDARIES WERE MEANINGLESS 22. It is incumbent
on this and every court, as well as the authorities, to realize the amount
of deception, chicanery, lying, manipulation and outright criminality
that Scientology will employ to hide the truth about their criminal activities.
They will spend any amount of money to do this. I know because I was part
of it for years. I received orders to break the law, and then I helped
to hide these criminal activities just as they are hiding them now. 25. Our corporate
positions were so much window dressing. It was our Scientology positions
and our membership in the Sea Organization that gave us the power to control
things within Scientology, including setting legal strategy for a corporation
that we were not officers or directors of, such as defendant Church of
Scientology of California.
27. Not everyone listed above was present for every meeting. However, I am positive that at sessions at which the legal strategy to be employed in the Wollersheim case was discussed, the lawyers involved in the Wollersheim case freely discussed that case and took directions from persons who were not officers, directors or employees of the defendant Church of Scientology of California, including me. DAVID MISCAVIGE CONTROLLED THE WOLLERSHEIM LAWYERS 28. David Miscavige routinely gave orders to attorneys representing Scientology corporations, regardless of which Scientology Corporation the attorneys ostensibly represented. This was true in every legal strategy session and in every legal case including Wollersheim. 29. I recall one legal strategy session after the judgment was rendered specifically. The attorneys representing CSC in the Wollersheim case were present. Marty Rathburn gave a general briefing on the case mentioning that the judge hated Scientology and that Scientology was not going to pay. David Miscavige said that Scientology was not going to pay even if it cost Scientology more than the thirty nillion-dollar judgment because we don't want to open the doors to others doing this. WARREN McSHANE DECLARATION 30. I have read the Declaration of Warren McShane dated June 11, 1999. Mr. McShane's Declaration is false. 31. For example, Mr. McShane states that: RTC never purchased, acquired, assumed, or otherwise obtained any assets of defendant Church of Scientology of California ('CSP) as part of any corporate reorganization of the Church of Scientology or otherwise. In fact, RTC obtained
trademarks that were registered in the name of CSC. 33. For example,
at these legal strategy sessions it was determined to organize a unit
within CSI known as the Wolly Unit. The Wolly Unit was to supervise and
coordinate various aspects of the Wollersheim case such as intelligence
gathering; public relations, including the "Not One Thin Dime For
Wollersheim" Campaign; explaining to Church members Scientology's
version of the case and day to day supervision of the outside attorneys
handling the CSC case. MISSION CORPORATE CATEGORY SORT OUT SHAM 36. In 1981, in response
to the Wollersheim case, and the IRS, Scientology created "Mission
Corporate Category Sort Out" ("MCCS"). On its face, to
the outside world, MCCS was designed to appear to separate corporate business
functions from ecclesiastic functions. Prior to this, all of Scientology
was under a hierarchy where defendant CSC was designated as the "Mother
Church" and all functions of Scientology came under the umbrella
of the "Mother Church."
40. Both before and
after the Wollersheim judgment, Scientology's Mission Corporate Sort Out
was designed to drain all the assets out of CSC and place them in other
corporations where they could not be touched by anyone who had a judgment
against CSC. 44. I have been informed
that RTC and CSI have recently moved to dismiss the Wollersheim case against
them on the basis of lathes. My understanding is that lathes is the legal
doctrine that is applied to bar someone's claim when they waited too long
to pursue the claim. A huge part of Scientology's legal strategy in the
Wollersheim case was to hide the fact that RTC and CSI were intimately
involved in the day-by-day direction of CSC's defense and to make the
case so complex, obtuse and expensive that no one would conceivably be
able to get past all the phony legal issues that Scientology was raising
to peal away the corporate layers and actually collect on the judgment. 46. I have not received
any compensation in any form for giving this declaration. I recognize
that by giving this declaration, I make myself a target for further attack
by Scientology, however, I am giving this declaration because it is the
truth and the right thing to do. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Colorado that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day
of June, 1999, at Boulder, Colorado ______________
|