AFFIDAVIT OF JESSE
PRINCE
July 27, 1998
I, Jesse Prince declare as follows:
1. I am over 18 years of age and currently reside in the state of Minnesota,
County of Hennepin. This declaration is of my own personal knowledge and
if called upon to testify to the facts herein I could and would be competently
able to testify thereto.
2. I am intimately familiar with the Scientology organization, movement
and beliefs because I was in Scientology for 16 years (1976-92) and served
in the highest ranks, including as the second in command of the Religious
Technology Center (RTC). At that time, my position was"Deputy Inspector
General, External" which meant being in charge of all activities outside
the body of Scientology. This included being in charge of all litigation
by or against any Scientology organization, intelligence (spying, covert
operations) brought against perceived or imagined "enemies" (which ranged
from critics to media to the courts), trademark registrations, and the
licensing of trademarks to other Scientology organizations, which was
how we tightly controlled all Scientology corporations while creating
the false impression of "corporate integrity."
3. It is incumbent on this and every court, as well as the authorities,
to realize the amount of deception, chicanery, lying, manipulation and
outright criminality that Scientology will employ to hide the truth about
their criminal activities. They will spend any amount of money to do this.
I know because I was part of it for years. I received orders to break
the law. I issued orders to break the law. I got others to break the law,
and then I helped to hide these criminal activities just as they are hiding
them now.
4. In fact, this tactic is one of the most coercive used by the Scientology
hierarchy: to involve members in criminal acts for which they are then
liable, which then prevents the person from speaking out. Even if the
member manages to leave or flee, they will be reluctant to speak to the
courts or the authorities because they were part of criminal activities.
Plus the organization is ready to use Mafia-like tactics to threaten an
ex-member if the hierarchy is afraid of their testimony. If the ex-member
does speak, the organization will claim no knowledge and blames the individual,
calling them a criminal when that person was doing nothing more than following
orders under duress.
5. Members of Scientology are induced to confess to acts that, if not
outright criminal, are embarrassing or possibly destructive to the person's
job, marriage or profession, for example, shoplifting, adultery, masturbation,
or drug abuse. The member is urged to write these down in their own handwriting,
under the guise that it is a "religious confessional" for the member's
good. The truth is that these "confessions" are kept to blackmail and
extort the member should they dare to speak out. The member is also coerced
to sign documents that are self-damaging while protecting the organization,
solely in case the member dares to leave their control and speak the truth.
I know because I watched this done to others, I did it to others and it
was done to me. That is why I espectfully urge this court to recognize
Scientology's tactics and treat them for what they are: criminal deceit
to defraud this court at any cost.
6. For the past
five years since I fled Scientology, I have been silent because it was
my intent to create a new life for myself, away from their obsessive control,
and it required all the energy that I could muster to do that. About two
weeks ago, I finally became curious as to what was happening within the
Scientology world and I used the Internet to look up Scientology and was
stunned to discover former friends who had also left and the conflicts
being waged in the courts. I contacted one (Stacy Young) who had been
a close friend for many years in the cult who told me what had been happening,
with former members fighting to have the abuses and the criminality exposed.
7. Because I have intimate and personal knowledge of issues in this case,
she put me in touch with attorney Dan Leipold and I traveled to his offices
in Santa Ana, California. After speaking with him and others, I realized
that this level of criminal fraud and deceit can no longer continue without
opposition. I could no longer remain silent, regardless of their terrorism.
I offered to tell the court how Scientology really operates with trademarks,
copyrights and the courts. In fact, I am doing this at the risk of enduring
the hate campaign this pseudo-religion will wage against me, as they have
against others, including judges.
8. Let me begin with some basic information about my own Scientology history:
I first became involved with Scientology in September 1976, in San Francisco.
In late 1976 I joined the elite Scientology paramilitary organization
known as the Sea Organization, also known as the "Sea Org" or the acronym
"SO." The Sea Organization is the actual nexus that controls the Scientology
empire. Sea Organization personnel are authorized to take over and control
Scientology organizations and to demote personnel, move bank accounts
and run the corporation as if the SO personnel were employees or representatives
of that corporation but they are not. This is true if the organization
was part of the "Church of Scientology" or one of the secular areas such
as Bridge Publications. This is possible because the only personnel allowed
into executive positions in these organization are those who are in full
agreement that the Sea Organization is the commanding organization. This
weeding out process guarantees there will be no executives who will resist
or protect their corporate integrity. This is how the Sea Organization
can operate with impunity, and continue to claim that it is merely a "fraternal
organization." The Sea Organization is a "fraternal organization" the
way the Cosa Nostra is.
9. Before I was recruited into the Religious Technology Center (RTC) in
1982, most of my experience was with Scientology technical material; the
\ actual codified techniques used within the organization. This gave me
considerable time to become familiar with the material, most of which
was written by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. It was that familiarity
that prompted my promotion to a technical position at RTC.
10. Physically, I was transferred to and lived and worked at what is known
as "Golden Era Studios," near Hemet, California. It is also known as "Gold"
or simply "the base." RTC's presence at Gold was fully known to all at
the base, but was kept hidden from all others, to try to make it appear
that Gold was merely a movie/tape production studio when really the movie/tape
production is nothing but a front to mask, hide and protect the top of
Scientology's actual power structure so they cannot be erved with subpoenas.
(The security system is more befitting a top secret military installation,
with its motion detectors, buried sensors, high-speed cameras, night cameras,
guards on motorcycles, and barbed wire fences wired to detect anyone touching
it etc.)
RTC was at that time the most senior, most powerful and most influential
organization in all of Scientology. All at RTC were Sea Org members, as
are all at the base. But because of RTC's position, we were the elite
at the base.
11. In March 1983,
I became the Deputy Inspector General, External, and a member of the Board
of Directors for RTC, as Treasurer. (The only other board members were
Warren McShane as Secretary and Vicki Aznaran as President, during this
time.) At the time I was appointed a member of the Board of Directors
of RTC I was forced to sign an undated letter of resignation. This is
standard practice with all Scientology board members and is another means
by which the Scientology corporations are controlled while giving the
appearance of corporate integrity.
12. In that capacity for the next few years, I traveled about the US and
outside of the US on behalf of RTC. I traveled to Germany, Italy, Australia,
the United Kingdom, Denmark, Mexico and Canada, with several trips to
some of these countries. These trips were to put together an infrastructure
that would then interface with RTC for the purpose of trademarks. I became
familiar with the law with regard to each area, interviewed and approved
law firms, and put the personnel in place that would report to RTC and
be our on-the-ground representatives in dealing with the attorneys etc.
13. When Hubbard died in 1986, there was a power struggle in Scientology
for the next 18 or so months that resulted in Hubbard's closest and most
powerful aide (Pat Broeker) being removed. The power was taken over by
David Miscavige who purged the organization of anyone who was friendly
with Broeker. In mid-1987, I was removed from my position and put under
armed guard at Happy Valley, a property the organization owns that is
a few miles west of Gold and located deep in the Soboba Indian Reservation.
I assume the undated resignation I provided on being appointed to the
Board was then dated and used to make it appear that I had resigned, when
I had not. After a few months, it was decided that I would not escape
and I was given various jobs at Gold but kept under watch. My pay was
standard Sea Org pay, $24 per week.
14. I should clarify
why I (and others) tolerated such treatment for so long. The ability to
tolerate such abusive conditions and treatment are one of the most basic
requirements for promotion in the Sea Organization and RTC. We were selected
and promoted because we vowed such loyalty and demonstrated it daily. Not
unlike a military unit, it is the ability of the Sea Org member to take
orders, carry out the assignment and to tolerate self degrading conditions
that ingratiates them to their seniors and to the system. That was why I
was promoted so highly and why I then tolerated more. Looking back on it,
I cannot believe that I actually tolerated such denigration and such abuse
and actually deluded myself that it was for my good as well as the good
of others.
15. In late
1991, my wife Monika became pregnant and although we were elated, she
was ordered to abort the child. The reason for the abortion order is that
Sea Org members were not allowed to have children. The order devastated
both my wife and me. Our dedication as Sea Org members clashed violently
with our intentions as parents and we went through a personal nightmare
with me opposing it, to no avail. She got the abortion and afterwards
she was not the same. She was devastated at the impact of what she did
and that was when she told me she wanted to leave. We fled, with the organization
close behind us, trying to find us. They finally did and convinced us
to return so we could "leave properly."
16. Once they had us again behind the barbwire and watched by security,
my wife was threatened that if we did not sign certain papers, she would
no longer be able to see her father and her sister, who were both in the
Sea Organization.
17. This is
another coercive power that the organization wields. Like a police state,
it can order and enforce family members to alter their relations, and
even get them to turn against each other. Monika and I knew that if the
organization said she would be kept from her father and sister (by control
over them), that she would not again be able to talk to them or see them,
let alone visit. This is called "disconnection" in Scientology. We agreed
to sign the papers and were able to leave.
18. On July
26, 1998, one of the cult's attorneys sent a long fax to Dan Leipold that
is their first not-so-veiled threat to me, warning me to be silent. The
attorney included the document they prepared for me and that I signed
under the conditions I just described. I am attaching his letter and the
documents I was forced to sign under duress as my first evidence of what
this criminal cult does to silence anyone speaking out. (Exhibit 1). It
does not surprise me, as it is a standard tactic, to force a person to
create or sign a self-damaging document to use when ready.
19. I have also been privy to the destruction and alteration of documents
to protect the group. On or about April of 1983 I was present at a meeting,
which took place in Los Angeles, California at a Scientology office called
Author Services, Inc. (ASI). ASI presented itself as the "literary agency"
for Hubbard but it was actually the top of the Scientology empire at that
time. All of Scientology was being directed from ASI in 1982. ASI was
where various Scientology corporations went to receive orders.
20. Present
at the meeting was David Miscavige, then the chairman of the board of
ASI, Vicki Aznaran then the Deputy Inspector General of Religious Technology
Center, (RTC) and Lymon Spurlock, who was "Director of Client Affairs"
for ASI. Mr. Miscavige expressed concern at this meeting that there might
possibly be a raid on Scientology by the IRS. At that time, none of the
churches of Scientology had received tax exempt status.
21. One principle reason why tax exempt status had not been granted was
the IRS's position that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard (LRH) was actually
the managing agent of Scientology in complete disregard of the corporate
structure of Scientology. We knew this to be a fact but also knew that
it violated IRS rules and thus had to be hidden.
22. There was concern that the IRS would obtain the hundreds of daily,
weekly and monthly LRH orders written by Mr. Hubbard and distributed throughout
Scientology. These orders were commonly referred to in Scientology as
"advices" to avoid the appearance that LRH was actually running Scientology.
In fact, LRH was running Scientology. The principle concern expressed
at this meeting was that the LRH orders or "advices" would be used to
name L. Ron Hubbrd as the managing agent of Scientology.
23. Because of an already existing fear that an LRH "advice" might fall
into the wrong hands, these orders from him were written in a way that
we could deny it was from him. His name was not on them. He was never
cited in the dispatch except in the third person. There was no signature
and a salutation in reply was never more than "Dear Sir." The routing
at the top referred to him merely as "*," an asterisk. However if a person
(or an agency) got enough of these, there would be little doubt that we
were in touch with Hubbard (via ASI) and he was telling us and each corporation
what to do to make him more money.
24. David Miscavige
specifically stated that ASI was "already dealing with the problem", ridding
ASI of any documents that would implicate L. Ron Hubbard as managing agent
of Scientology. He stated that under his directive the LRH orders, or
"advices", were being collected and transferred by truck to a Riverside
County recycling plant where the documents were to be "pulped". This method
of destruction was considered to be better than shredding. I was also
given instructions that I was in charge of purging the remainder of the
Scientology organization of LRH orders. This was to include Church of
Scientology of California (CSC); Church of Scientology International (CSI);
and RTC.
25. Several weeks after this first meeting I attended a second meeting
at the ASI offices concerning the continuing destruction of Scientology
corporate documentation. In attendance at the second meeting were David
Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki Aznaran, Norman Starkey and Marty Rathburn.
At this meeting, David Miscavige for the first time stated that Scientology
had been ordered by a court to produce various documents concerning a
former Scientology member named Lawrence Wollersheim who had a lawsuit
pending in Los Angeles against the Church of Scientology of California.
The court had ordered Scientology to produce Mr. Wollersheim's entire
"preclear" (PC) file.
26. A "PC "
file is one of several files kept on members. The PC file is the file
that includes all written records of all "confessionals" done by the member.
This means that it includes not only the most self-damaging material but
it also reflects every problem the person might have had with the organization,
including complaints. This PC file grows with the person's tenure in Scientology.
27. Mr. Wollersheim's PC file was several thousand pages in length and
stood as high as a six-foot tall man. Initially at this meeting it was
decided that Mr. Wollersheim's PC file would be redacted and culled of
any evidence or documentation which might assist Mr. Wollersheim in his
lawsuit against CSC. There was also concern that the materials known as
Clear, OT I, OT II, OT III and NED for OT's (NOTS) would be open to public
inspection if Mr. Wollersheim's files were produced as ordered. Scientologists
are taught that a person could catch pneumonia and die if that person
is prematurely exposed to these "upper level" materials without first
having taken many hours of preparatory auditing. Ultimately, approximately
50 pages were produced pursuant to the court order. Mr. Wollersheim's
PC file was culled based on a direct order from David Miscavige.
28. Later, I was informed that a second court order was issued to produce
Mr. Wollersheim's entire file. Faced with the prospect of having to produce
the entire file David Miscavige gave orders that the entire file simply
be destroyed by being pulped.
29. Pursuant to Mr. Miscavige's orders I ordered Rick Aznaran to take
Mr. Wollersheim's PC files to the recycling plant in Riverside to be pulped.
Several hours after I gave the order to have Mr. Wollersheim's PC files
destroyed, Mr. Aznaran returned and confirmed that the records had been
pulped and even showed me a small bottle of pulped material, saying "Here's
what's left."
30. The material that David Miscavige ordered destroyed and which Rick
Aznaran had pulped was the same material that the court had ordered produced
in Mr. Wollersheim's Los Angeles court case against CSC.
31. In early
1983 I attended a meeting at Scientology's ASI office in Los Angeles.
In attendance at this meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki
Aznaran, Patricia Brice and Edith Buchele. The meeting concerned Scientology
copyrights. In particular, David Miscavige stated that Scientology was
"in trouble" concerning the copyright status of the many published materials
of founder L Ron Hubbard. Concern was expressed that many of Mr. Hubbard's
published materials had become 'public domain"because the materials had
not been registered with the United States Copyright office for many years.
David Miscavige stated that Scientology had failed to register copyrights
for thousands of pages of Scientology material written by Mr. Hubbard.
These records included the numerous policy letters and bulletins published
by Mr. Hubbard. In particular, Mr. Hubbard published "Policy Letters"
(always published in green ink on white paper and intended as administrative
directives) LRH ED's (Executive Directives) which are used for various
topics, (always issued as blue ink on white paper) and "Technical Bulletins"
published with red ink on white paper covering technical aspect of Scientology
such as Auditing techniques, Policy and Ethics.
32. At the same meeting in early 1983 David Miscavige specifically ordered
Patricia Brice (who at the time was L. Ron Hubbard's personal secretary
and an employee of ASI) to begin the process of mass copyright registration
filings for all of L. Ron Hubbard's materials. This order was given despite
the fact that Mr. Miscavige was already aware that many of the materials
in question were already in the public domain. Thus, I know from personal
knowledge that in mid 1983 Scientology began a massive program to register
Mr. Hubbard's material with the United State's Copyright office.
33. Based on my many years of reading and studying Scientology directives
including my time as a "Co-Audit Supervisor" and "Inspector General Cramming
Officer" I became intimately familiar with the content, form, manner of
distribution and publication of Scientology works and directives including
the works of L. Ron Hubbard. As a Cramming Officer it was my job to insure
that those who employ Scientology "tech" properly adhere to the official
guidelines adopted by Scientology.
34. I was requested
by counsel for Mr. Wollersheim to review the exhibits to BPI's renewed
motion for summary judgement. These were contained in more than 20 banker's
boxes.
In reviewing these boxes of exhibits I selected out documents at random
to inspect. The chart below explains the result of my examination of certain
of the exhibits. In examining the plaintiff's exhibits I compared the
alleged LRH originals submitted by the plaintiff's as exhibits to some
early editions of Scientology compilations which contains the policy issues
in question. I employed a "1st edition" of the Organization Executive
Course, and a "First printing of the Scientology Technical Bulletins for
comparison to what BPI has claimed are the LRH originals.
35. I have attached hereto copies of various LRH materials that were published
by Scientology in the early 1970's that prove conclusively that the copy
right notices on BPI's purported "LRH originals" were not present then,
but placed on the "originals" at a later date.
36. The above chart documents my observations in reviewing the documents
that I selected at random to review. The important points that I believe
the Court should note with reference to these documents are as follows:
1.
Exhibits B-1289; 1290; 1291; 1292 and 1293 contain a 1953 copyright
notice. However, the copyright registrations submitted by BPI are
for a compilation published in 1955.
2. Exhibits B4;
B-94 and B-215 all contain copyright notices from the 50's, 60's and
70's that contain notations to CSI. CSI is the Church of Scientology
International, which did not come into existence until 1981. Therefore,
either BPI's "originals" are not originals as claimed, or the copyright
notices were placed on these documents long after they were published.
(Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 attached hereto).
3. Exhibits B-59;
B-369; and B-371 contain copyright notices from 1958. However, when
these originals are compared to first printings or first editions
of compilations put out by Scientology in the 1970's, these copyright
notices are not present, indicating that they were placed in the "originals"
subsequent to the compilations being published. (Exhibits 5-7).
4.
Exhibit B-2 is substantially different from that published as an
original in OEC Vol. II, 1st Ed. 1970. (Exhibit 8 attached hereto).
5.
Exhibit B-1287. The FACTNet copy bears virtually no resemblance
to the BPI original.
6.
Exhibits B-1288; B-214; and C-3. The BPI originals contain no copyright
notice.
7. Exhibit B-1
shows on its face it is not an original but "Issue II."
8. Exhibits B-248;
B-249; and B-157 show on their face they were published elsewhere
prior to the claimed original publication. |
37. Based on my knowledge
gained as a staff member of Scientology, including my assignment as "Chief
Cramming Officer" and based on my examination of the exhibits submitted
by BPI in support of their renewed motion for summary judgment, it appears
that numerous "originals" submitted by BPI are not originals at all and
that copyright notices were placed on documents long after publication back-dating
them to the date of publication.
Further declarant sayeth
naught.
I declare, under penalty
of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State
of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 27th
day of July, 1998, at Santa Ana, California.
JESSE PRINCE |