DECLARATION OF STACY
YOUNG
I, STACY YOUNG, declare as follows:
1. I was a member
of the Church of Scientology for 14 years, from January, 1975 until July,
1989. From October, 1975 until July, 1989, I was a member of the Sea Organization,
the most dedicated group of Scientologists in the entire organization.
During my tenure in Scientology, I acquired extensive knowledge of the
counseling methods as well as administrative and management practices
and procedures of the organization.
2. The matters set forth herein are of my own personal knowledge and I
could and would competently testify thereto.
3. I have reviewed Exhibits 1, 2, 6, 18-25, 29,30, 32-35, 41, 42, 44-80
and 82-87 of this motion and relied on them in forming the opinions set
forth in this declaration.
4. My first experience with Scientology was at the Mission of Atlanta,
Georgia, where I attended a series of introductory lectures in January,
1975. I received my first Scientology auditing in Atlanta, called "Life
Repair", and I also took several courses.
5. I joined the Sea Organization ("Sea Org") at the Advanced
Organization in Los Angeles ("AOLA") in October, 1975, signing
a billion-year contract to confirm my dedication to Scientology and "clearing
the planet" (see explanation below).
6. All staff members involved in the delivery of the confidential upper
levels of Scientology processing ("OT Levels"), and all staff
members involved in Scientology management are members of the Sea Org,
living communally and under the authority of the Sea Org command lines
24 hours a day. The Sea Org has complete authority over all Scientology
and Scientology-related organizations, including all nonprofit and for-profit
corporations. It cuts across all corporate boundaries and can take over
any Scientology organization without notice. Any Scientologist who refuses
to submit to Sea Org authority is declared a "suppressive person"
and expelled from Scientology.
7. For a Scientologist, it is crucial to move up "The Bridge to Total
Freedom", and get everyone else on Earth up "The Bridge"
as well. The Bridge is composed of a series of specific processes developed
by L. Ron Hubbard in which a counselor, called an "auditor",
asks certain questions of a person, called a "preclear." The
two people are normally alone in a room during this procedure, which is
known as "auditing." The auditor's questions are designed to
get the preclear to look at various incidents that have happened in the
person's life. By doing this in a certain way, the person frees up mental
energy that has been locked away by these incidents.
8. The idea is that
the person frees up more and more mental energy by moving up The Bridge,
regaining sanity and acquiring more control over life. The first major
milestone on The Bridge is known as "going Clear." At this point,
the person no longer has his or her own "reactive mind", (also
called the "bank" or "case") which is the part of
the mind that stores all the negative energy that keeps a person from
realizing his or her full potential. After one achieves the state of Clear,
one moves on to the confidential levels known as "Operating Thetan"
"thetan" being Hubbard's term for the life force which is the
person himself). These states are numbered, such as OT 1, OT2, OT3, etc.
Currently, the highest level that can be achieved is OT 8.
9. Scientology's goal is to "clear the planet", by which is
meant getting everyone on Earth up the Bridge to Clear and beyond.
10. I was a staff member at AOLA from October, 1975 through December,
1978. Once I had completed my training and had attained the "case
level" of OT 3, I became an "AO Auditor" and audited hundreds
of hours on public preclears as well as staff nembers. I audited many
of the "tough cases" at AOLA because of any ability to "get
the pc through" whatever was stopping him or her from continuing
"up the Bridge." I also did many security checks on staff members.
A security check is a technique whereby a person is supposed to confess
to his or her crimes, particularly crimes against Scientology.
11. In 1977 I was posted as Interne Supervisor at AOLA. In this capacity
I supervised auditors in-training, known as internes, to certify them
as qualified professional auditors. To perform this function I had to
understand auditing procedures precisely, from the most basic processes
to the advanced processes and procedures of Class 6 and Class 8, which
are advanced levels of expertise, so that I could recognize whether or
not the internes were conducting themselves as proper auditors.
12. As a result of my experiences at AOLA I acquired a high level of expertise
as a "tech terminal," meaning one who is knowledgeable about
the technical application of Scientology counseling and training methods.
13. At the end of 1977 I transferred to the United States Guardian's Office
("USGO") in Los Angeles. I was a staff member in the USGO from
January 1978 through January 1982. The Guardian's Office was the part
of Scientology that handled Public Relations, Intelligence and Legal matters
for Scientology.
14. Because of my technical background, I was posted as the Organizing
Officer ("Org Officer") for the Public Relations Bureau and,
later, as the Org Officer for the entire Guardian's Office. As the Org
Officer, my functions included the handling of all personnel and organizational
matters, such as correcting a staff member who made mistakes, getting
staff members into auditing or ethics handling when they were sick or
upset or in trouble, recruiting new people for staff, and promoting or
demoting staff members as needed. I was also responsible for the establishment
and proper administration of all the Guardian's Office personnel throughout
the United States. Because the Guardian's Office oversaw certain aspects
of the administration of all other Scientology organizations, I became
very familiar with the overall structure of Scientology and how the various
organizations interact with each other and with the outside world.
15. In early 1982, I was posted in Special Project as PR Assistant under
my husband, Robert Vaughn Young. In this position I became familiar with
the L. Ron Hubbard archives materials, which was the complete collection
of all of Hubbard's personal papers, including diaries, letters and notes
that he had kept from a very early age.
16. Several months later Special Project became what is now Author Services,
Inc., a for-profit company whose ostensible purpose was to be L. Ron Hubbard's
literary agency. I was taken out of PR and made the Organizing Officer
for ASI in April, 1982. On this position I worked directly under David
Miscavige, who was chairman of the Board of ASI, ("COB ASI"),
to carry out his orders concerning the staff of ASI.
17. David Miscavige, known as DM, has been the head of Scientology since
1981. His loyalty to L. Ron Hubbard and his adherence to Scientology procedures
is absolute, and he is utterly ruthless about maintaining his power. He
moved the seat of power from ASI to the Religious Technology Center in
1987, during a period of time when the IRS was investigating ASI's ties
to the nonprofit corporations of Scientology. At that point he appointed
himself Chairman of the Board of RTC, which is his current title.
18. Although ASI was established as a for-profit, non-religious corporation,
in reality while DM was COB ASI, the staff of ASI ran the entire Scientology
network. ASI had complete control over the management of all Scientology
orgs and missions, all Office of Special Affairs activities, all transfers
of funds between church accounts and LRH accounts, every aspect of the
life of anyone who was a Scientologist, whether staff or public. These
powers were moved to RTC in 1987, as explained above.
19. Because of my experience in ASI I am familiar with the day-to-day
activities of the highest levels of management of Scientology. I have
firsthand knowledge of the establishment of the corporate structure of
Scientology as it now exists, having worked with the staff who were responsible
for creating it. The purpose of this activity was to create an impenetrable,
legally defensible network of corporations such that neither the IRS nor
any other legitimate agency of government could "pierce the corporate
veil" of Scientology organizations, thereby freeing Scientology management
to transfer funds between organizations without concern for the law.
20. I am also familiar
with the absolute authority which the highest levels of Scientology management
exercise over every aspect of Scientology and Scientology-related organizations,
whether "church" or "secular."
21. In September
of 1982, I was assigned to the Rehabilitation Project Force ("RPF"),
the Scientology version of a prison camp. I was on the RPF in Los Angeles
for eight months. As a result of this experience, I am familiar with the
absolute control which the highest levels of Scientology management have
over the behavior and thought processes of every Sea Org member. There
is only one way for a good Sea Org member to behave and think, and any
deviation from this is punished immediately and severely. In turn, it
is the responsibility of all members of Sea Org management to bring about
the same pattern of behavior and thought in all Scientologists under their
authority, regardless of whether those under their authority are part
of the "church" or the various "secular" arms of Scientology.
This distinction means nothing within Scientology; it was created purely
to facilitate dissemination of Scientology and to fend off Scientology's
"enemies" such as the IRS.
22. From May, 1983,
when I was allowed off the RPF, until July, 1984 I was posted as Course
Supervisor at the International training Organization ("ITO")
in Los Angeles. From this position I trained hundreds of fledgling Scientology
executives from all over the world on the administrative and management
policies of L. Ron Hubbard known as the Organization Executive Course,
or OEC. As a result of this experience, I am very familiar with the Administrative
policy of Scientology and know that Hubbard formulated it to facilitate
the establishing and organizing of his worldwide network of Scientology
organizations.
23. In August, 1984 I was transferred back to the PR Division of the Guardian's
Office, which by that time had been renamed the Office of Special Affairs.
My primary functions were as a writer and editor for FREEDOM Magazine,
the Scientology publication which was originally created as a vehicle
for attacking individuals and groups who were perceived as threats to
Scientology.
24. In 1985 I personally created a nonprofit, non-tax-exempt corporation
called North Star Publishing for the purpose of moving FREEDOM Magazine
away from the Church of Scientology. I did this so that FREEDOM would
have more credibility and not be seen as a mouthpiece of Scientology.
This corporation was active until 1987, and during the time I ran North
Star, I gained experience in interfacing with the business world while
running a purely Scientology organization. I am familiar with the legal,
financial and public relations sleights of hand required by Scientology
corporations that must deal with the non-Scientology business world,
25. In 1987, North
Star Publishing was reintegrated as part of OSA again. My primary functions
were again writing and editing. I wrote for FREEDOM Magazine, Scientology
Today, and the Crusader. In Scientology, every aspect of PR is directed
toward a particular "public." FREEDOM Magazine was directed
toward government officials, legislators, heads of businesses, and other
key "publics" who needed to be brought into agreement with Scientology's
views of the key attackers of Scientology, such as the IRS, psychiatrists,
etc. Scientology Today was directed toward all Scientologists and was
intended to promote OSA as a powerful and successful arm of Scientology
that was winning the war against the enemies of Scientology. The Crusader
was a publication directed toward religious leaders and ministers of other
religions and was intended to create allies for Scientology in the religious
community.
26. As a writer and
editor in the PR Division of OSA, my primary responsibility was to "communicate
the correct message to the correct public." When I wrote for Scientology
Today, a publication intended for Scientologists, the viewpoint to be
communicated was that Scientology was everywhere, that Scientology always
wins, and that no matter who we are or what we are doing, we are all Scientologists
working for the same purpose: to clear the planet.
27. When I wrote
for FREEDOM Magazine, which is for non-Scientologists, specifically media,
government officials, legislators and major business leaders, I was not
to emphasize Scientology at all, but rather, I was to present a strictly
factual, professional view of whatever subject I was writing on. These
subjects were "exposes" of the crimes of enemies of Scientology,
particularly the IRS, psychiatry and any other government agency or individual
that was attacking Scientology.
28. The editors
of FREEDOM Magazine, including two others and myself, created a front
group called "The Coalition of IRS whistleblowers" so that when
we wrote stories attacking the IRS we could quote someone else rather
than having to attribute it to Scientology. To do this we ran ads in several
papers asking for current and former employees of the IRS to come forward
and tell their stories of abuse within the agency." In this way,
we acquired several disgruntled former IRS agents, one disgruntled former
congressman, and several "abuse cases" (citizens who felt they
had been treated unjustly by the IRS) who were all willing to speak out
publicly against the IRS. We staged several press conferences at which
former IRS agent PaulDesFosses, former Congressman George Hansen, and
others made public statements about how abusive the IRS was. We then reported
on these events in FREEDOM, thereby putting us at arm's length from the
statements being made. The group was funded, organized and managed by
Scientology, but this was never mentioned.
29. The Crusader was a front publication created during the "Religious
Freedom Crusade," a PR event staged for the Wollersheim case, as
a means of "allying" ministers and other religious leaders and
to create goodwill for Scientology. There was no mention of Scientology
in the copyright or masthead of the publication, and no one outside of
OSA was to know that the Crusader was published by Scientology. In each
issue there might be one or two stories on a Scientology-related issue,
but most of the stories were about other religions and other topics concerning
religious freedom. No one in OSA or on the OSA command lines cared about
these other issues. It was simply a way to mask the true purpose of the
publication and to get religious leaders to view Scientology as a religion
that they should defend along with their own faith.
30. When Hubbard died in 1986 I was ordered to write the copy for the
"In Memoriam" full-page eulogy that ran in several major papers
across the country. I was then assigned the task of creating the "LRH
booklet," a longer eulogy of Hubbard in which his achievements in
various areas were catalogued. These areas included Explorer, Philosopher,
Drug Rehabilitation, Educator, Administrator, Artist, Author of Fiction,
and Humanitarian.
31. Two different versions of the booklet were created. For Scientologists
and other religious "publics," the subhead on the cover of the
booklet read "Best-selling Author, Founder of Scientology, Friend
to Millions." For businesses and educators, the subhead read "Best-selling
Author, Humanitarian, Friend to Millions." Certain passages in the
text of the booklet were also revised for the "secular" version
of the booklet, because WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises)
and ABLE (Association for Better Living and Education) would not be able
to use the booklet with their potential markets if it showed Hubbard as
the founder of Scientology. He could be the author of the writings that
had later been adopted by the Church of Scientology, but if the WISE and
ABLE publics found out that they were being promoted by a leg of the Church
of Scientology, they would be turned off. So two different versions were
published and carefully separated so that the secular version went to
WISE and ABLE and the "religious" version went to Scientologists
and other religions.
32. As a result of my experience as a writer for these different Scientology
publications, I am familiar with Scientology's practice of changing its
story for whatever public it is trying to reach. Often I rewrote the same
basic story for each publication, completely changing the wording and
overall thrust of the story to appeal to the different publics that were
going to read it.
33. As a writer in OSA I was also responsible for writing rebuttals of
negative stores about Scientology that were published in various newspapers
across the country. I was also assigned to write rebuttals of books that
were published that were negative about Hubbard and Scientology. As a
result of this work I became very familiar with the polices and practices
of Scientology with regard to individuals and groups that criticize the
organization. I have personal knowledge that the practices which were
formerly called "fair game" continue to be employed although
the term "fair game" is no longer used. These tactics are laid
out in many of the key policies that are studied and applied by staff
of OSA.
34. In July, 1989 my husband and I left Scientology. We lived in San Diego
from 1989 until August, 1991, at which time we moved to Newport Beach.
We are currently living in Corona del Mar, California.
35. As a result of my experiences in Scientology, I am qualified to discuss
the policies, procedures and practices of this organization, including
its relationship to Sterling Management.
36. Within Scientology there is no question that Sterling is a dissemination
arm of Scientology, and that its main purpose is to feed new people into
the "church." Certainly no one in Scientology is actually concerned
about helping dentists or veterinarians to increase their business. There
is no policy by L. Ron Hubbard that encourages Scientologists to help
dentists and veterinarians increase their business, so there is no interest
in it. The only reason that Scientologists engage in any kind of activity
is that it is covered in a policy written by L. Ron Hubbard.
37. Sterling Management
is allowed to exist for two reasons: (1) it acts as a feeder of new preclears
into Scientology and therefore, (2) it is an excellent source of income
for Scientology. Income is always of great interest to Scientology management.
38. I have read a number of declarations by dentists and others who have
been taken in by Sterling (including declarations by Alexander
Turbyne, John Finucane, Glaydon R. Kern, D.D.S., Michael E. Rolfing,
D.D.S., Julia A. Holmes, D.D.S., Connie Hyler-Both, Frances S. Miller
and Peter S. Miller.) These people are all bewildered by the fact that
no one in Sterling is trained as a consultant in their field of expertise.
What these people do not understand is that for a Scientologist, the only
valid field of expertise is Scientology. Everything else is only valuable
to the degree that it will forward Scientology and speed the spread of
Scientology throughout the world. For a Sterling "consultant",
the best possible result for one of their "clients" would be
that he or she (1) gives all their money to Scientology, ind (2) closes
the business altogether and joins staff at Sterling (or some other branch
of Scientology). If the person is actually in a powerful position of some
sort in the business world, the idea would be to turn them into a Scientologist
and get them disseminating Scientology to everyone they do business with.
In that case, it would be better not to recruit them onto staff since
they would be able to disseminate more effectively by remaining in place
in society.
39. This is simply the way it is, and it is an attitude which is voiced
with pride within Scientology. It is only for those who are not yet in
Scientology that this charade of helping them expand their business is
played out.
40. This charade is part of the public persona of Scientology, which is
held up for all non Scientologists to see. This image of Scientology is
carefully orchestrated so that different parts of society are shown a
"Scientology" that will be most appealing to them. The entire
purpose of this elaborate public relations activity is to hook a person
into becoming a Scientologist by getting him or her to accept one little
piece of it that is acceptable, and then to draw them in further by gradually
introducing them to more and more of the "technology" until
before they know it, they are on "The Bridge to Total Freedom."
41. Hubbard discusses this quite openly in a number Of policies. For example,
in a policy called PR Series 2, the Missing Ingredient (HCO PL 13 Aug
70 II), Hubbard begins by stating emphatically that one should "NEVER
USE LIES IN PR." But then he qualifies his statement, as follows:
"Handling
truth is a touchy business also. You don't have to tell everything
you know - that would jam he comm[unication] lines too. Tell an
acceptable truth."
"Agreement
with one's message is what PR is seeking to achieve. Thus, the message
must compare to the personal experience of the audience."
"So PR becomes the technique of communicating an acceptable
truth - and which will attain the desirable result."
"The
use of R [reality] not only involves truth, it involves acceptable
truth and that involves the fixed opinions of another or others
and their experience. All this is contained in the subject of REALITY."
"What is the R of others?"
"This
involves SURVEYS."
"Then
you know what truth he or they will accept."
|
42. He says more
on the same subject in PR Series 3, Wrong Publics (HCO PL 13 Aug 70 III):
"There
are hundreds of different types of publics."
"An interest in common or a professional or caste characteristic
in common - some similarity amongst a special group - determines the
type of public or audience."
"The PR needs this grouping as he can expect each different type
of public to have different interests. Therefore, his promotion to
them must be designed specially for each type of public. . . . "
"The PR is after a result, a call in, a reply, a response."
"The right message in the right form to the right public gets
the result."
"A wrong message to the wrong public simply costs lots of money
and gets no result." |
43. It is all a matter
of publics, and how to go about getting them into Scientology in the fastest,
most economical way. This is clear in ads for Sterling Management in Scientology
publications such as Prosperity and Source, because when they are communicating
to their Scientology public, they drop the charade. Barbara Wilson's success
story in Issue 74 of Source is a perfect example of how a Sterling staff
member would characterize what they are actually doing. She would, of
course, never communicate this way to a potential client. (See Exhibit
"32")
44. The guise of
the helpful, professional consulting business drops immediately if a client
shows any sign of exposing Sterling's charade. One can catch a glimpse
of the true face of Scientology in a letter dated October 8, 1987, signed
by Joan Heller, Legal Officer. (See Exhibit "35") The routing
on the letter is from Sterling Management Systems to WISE International,
which is Sterling's senior within the Sea Org. Apparently Joan was sending
this letter to her senior for approval before sending it out.
45. The name of the doctor to whom this letter was to be sent has been
deleted, but from the content it is clear that he had asked for his money
back and had been speaking out publicly in some negative way about Sterling.
Within Scientology, publicly criticizing Scientology is a suppressive
act, and the person committing such an act is known as a suppressive person.
This means the person is an enemy of Scientology, and there are many policies
covering what to do to silence such a person. It used to be known as the
"fair game" policy. As stated earlier, although it is no longer
called fair game, the practice is still in force.
46. In this particular
letter, the Legal Officer tells him that a review of his file "shows
that you actually make more money than you report to the IRS and that
you are skimming around $25,000 off the top prior to reports. This information
is only what we have found so far. If this matter went public, of course,
we would have to pursue what's behind this attack and expose any other
crimes found. It is our experience that those who attack us, after all
the things we try to do for them, have something to hide. We are more
than willing to review this publicly if you continue your slanderous and
defamatory accusations." In the real world, this is a clear example
of blackmail. Within Scientology, it is simply standard procedure for
protecting Scientology from its enemies.
47. The particular
lawsuit against the Cult Awareness Network for which this declaration
has been prepared, is a classic example of the kind of tactics employed
by Scientology to silence its critics. CAN has been a thorn in Scientology's
side for many years, and as far as Scientology is concerned, the two groups
are involved in a fight to the death. Certainly Scientology's aim is to
put CAN out of business permanently. This was its aim when I was personally
involved in attacks against CAN, and I have no reason to believe this
aim has changed. As stated earlier, Scientologists do exactly what they
are instructed to do in L. Ron Hubbard policies and nothing else. Policy
on the handling of critics of Scientology has not changed. Therefore,
until CAN stops speaking out against Scientology, the group will continue
to be attacked, harassed and sued by Scientology.
I declare under
penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 9th
day of September, 1993 at Corona del Mar, California.
__________________
Stacy Young
|